Oxygen vs Breakdance: My Thoughts as a WordPress Designer
I just published a full deep-dive over on my agency site — MKS Web Design’s Oxygen vs Breakdance Comparison — and it’s one of those pieces that had me thinking long after I hit publish. There’s something about comparing these two builders that feels bigger than just a feature list. It’s about workflow, philosophy, and honestly, how we think as creators.
For context, I’ve been designing and building websites for Kansas businesses for years. I live in that space between design and development — where the code meets the creative. So yeah, this post is more of a reflection from my side of the screen rather than another breakdown. If you want the full comparison, head to the main article on MKS Web Design. This one’s the personal remix.

What Drew Me to Both Builders
When Oxygen Builder first launched, it completely shifted how I thought about building websites. It stripped away the hand-holding and said, “Hey, if you understand HTML and CSS, come build your site your way.” That developer-first mindset still resonates with me. It feels clean, intentional, and powerful — like building something brick by brick with your own tools.
Then came Breakdance, and at first, I’ll admit, I was skeptical. Another builder from the same company? Really? But once I got into it, I saw what they were doing. It’s not just a clone of Oxygen; it’s a different mindset. It’s made for designers who want to move fast, focus on visuals, and deliver. It’s kinda like if Oxygen is jazz, Breakdance is pop — both legit art forms, just different rhythms.
Why It’s Not Just About the Tools
I said this over on MKS Web Design’s version, but it’s worth repeating: you can build the same site in either builder. The difference is in how you get there. Oxygen gives me freedom and structure. Breakdance gives me speed and polish. And honestly, that says a lot about where I’m at on any given day as a creative.
Some days I crave precision — every div named, every class structured. Other days, I just want to build, experiment, and hit publish without diving deep into selectors. That’s the beauty of having both tools available. Each one mirrors a different part of the creative process.
A Kansas Perspective
Working out of Manhattan, Kansas, most of my client sites need to be both beautiful and maintainable. I love the flexibility Oxygen gives me for advanced builds — the kind where performance and clean code matter most. But when I’m building sites for small business owners who want control, Breakdance makes more sense. It’s quick, it’s smooth, and clients can actually edit things without breaking anything major (thankfully).
At MKS Web Design, I’ve used both across different projects, depending on the scope. It’s honestly become part of how I think about web design strategy — not just “what can we build,” but “how will this site live and evolve over time.”
Final Thoughts
In the end, Oxygen and Breakdance aren’t competitors. They’re companions in the WordPress ecosystem — two sides of the same creative coin. Oxygen gives control to the developer in me; Breakdance frees up the designer in me. Both have their place, and both will probably keep evolving long after this post ages out.
If you want the full comparison — including history, pricing, and detailed features — check out the complete write-up on MKS Web Design. I go way deeper there with screenshots, technical context, and a few opinions sprinkled in (because I can’t help it).
This post, though — it’s just me, Anthony, thinking out loud about how two tools can represent two different ways of creating. And maybe that’s the real takeaway — that creativity isn’t about picking one tool forever, it’s about using what fits where you are right now.
